Evaluating Responses of Tropical Lowland Cabbage to Early Transplanting
and Short-Term Drought Prior to Cultivation at Riparian Wetlands during Dry Season
Benyamin Lakitan1,2*,
Kartika Kartika1,3 and Nabila Pratiwi1
1College of Agriculture, Universitas Sriwijaya, Inderalaya 30662,
Indonesia
2Research Center for Sub-Optimal Lands (PUR-PLSO), Universitas
Sriwijaya, Palembang 30139, Indonesia
3Research Center for Biology, National Research and Innovation Agency,
Cibinong 16911, Indonesia
*For correspondence: blakitan60@unsri.ac.id
Received 03 March 2021; Accepted 29 October 2021; Published 22 July 2022
Abstract
Water source for agricultural activities can be very
limited at tropical riparian wetlands during dry season. This seasonal drought
condition and flooding occurrence during rainy season limits agricultural
activity to only single rice cultivation annually, starting after flood water
has almost fully subsided. This study was focused on intensifying agricultural
activity at the wetland during dry season and creating successful cabbage
cultivation as soon as after rice has been harvested. Appropriate transplanting
practice was identified and tolerability of cabbage plant to drought stress
prior to and during head development was evaluated. Results of this study
indicated that cabbage seedlings should be transplanted at 3 weeks after sowing
(WAS) for early harvest and higher head yield. Cabbage was able to tolerate
short-term drought stress prior to and during head development. Leaf water
content significantly dropped after 4 days of drought stress; however, cabbage
could recuperate and head yield was not significantly affected. Leaf length and
width can be used as accurate predictor for leaf area. Furthermore, canopy area
at 5 WAS, size of the largest leaf at 7 WAS, and leaf length at 9 WAS can be
used as predictors for head yield, especially head fresh weight; however, the
most accurate prediction was using leaf length at 9 WAS or just before head
initiation. Based on results of this study, cultivation of lowland cabbage was
promising during dry season at tropical riparian wetlands. © 2022 Friends Science Publishers
Keywords: Canopy area;
Head yield; Leaf area; Seedling age; Short-term drought; Yield prediction
Introduction
Availability
of tropical lowland cabbage varieties has opened opportunity for local farmers
to increase production of this leafy vegetable; otherwise, cabbage production
can only be cultivated at very limited area of highlands. Total acreage of
lowlands suitable for agriculture was very significant compared to acreage of
non-conservation highlands in Indonesia. At present, riparian wetlands in
Indonesia has not been intensively cultivated, especially during dry season
after rice crop has been harvested (Lakitan et al. 2018; 2019).
Therefore, prior to introducing cabbage cultivation to the wetlands,
adaptability of this vegetable to gradual soil drying which can cause drought
stress to the plant should be evaluated; specifically, during late stage of
cabbage growth, i.e., prior to and during head development. It should be
recognized that water availability for agriculture activities during dry season
at riparian wetland can be very inadequate (Garssen et al. 2014; Ameli
and Creed 2019; Albano et al. 2020).
Another
strategy for minimizing direct exposure to drought stress at riparian wetlands
is by growing cabbage plant as early as possible after rice harvesting. Rice is
a highly prioritized crop for wetland farmers so that other crops can only be grown
after rice crop has been harvested (Chen et al. 2015; Ria et al.
2020). This strategy includes preparing cabbage seedling at 3 to 5 weeks before
rice harvesting such that soon after rice has been harvested, cabbage seedlings
could be transplanted to the same rice field. Most of the time before rice
harvesting, flood water at paddy field has long been diminished, especially at
the short-term flooded riparian wetland type, i.e., flooded for less
than three months annually (Cabezas et al. 2011; Junk et al.
2011). Objectives of this research were to evaluate performance of cabbage
plants using seedlings transplanted at 3, 4 and 5 weeks after sowing (WAS) and
response to drought stress prior to or during head development.
Materials and Methods
Materials and cultivation
practice
Cabbage cultivar used in this study was a hybrid F1
Sehati variety; specially breed for its adaptation to tropical lowland
ecosystem. Cabbage seeds were soaked in water for one hour prior to be sown in
seedling treys containing the growing substrate. Growing substrate used in this
study was a mix of soil and chicken manure with ratio 3:2 v/v. Seeds were sown
in each cell of the seedling trey. Three seeds were sown in each cell of the
trey; however, only one vigorous seedling was selected during transplanting.
This procedure was conducted for increasing uniformity of seedlings used in
this study.
Selected
seedlings were transplanted into 30 cm diameter pots up to 25 cm height. The
pots have four drainage holes at bottom and four side holes at height of 25 cm
from base of the pot as direct outlets for surface water for preventing
waterlogging during heavy rainfall. This study was conducted outdoor.
Treatments and measured
parameters
Seedling ages at time of transplanting were set as treatments,
i.e., at 3, 4 and 5 weeks after sowing (WAS). Each seedling-age
population was split into two drought stress treatments, i.e., exposed
during head initiation, indicated by young leaves started to bend inward at 63
to 67 days after sowing (DAS) and during head enlargement at 91 to 95 DAS.
Drought stress exposures were conducted in a mini greenhouse (4 m x 6 m) to
avoid rainfall. Level of stress was evaluated by comparing some measured
morphological traits during drought exposure between treated and daily-watered
control plants. Data were collected at around midday and analyzed using
pairwise comparison procedure. Drought stress exposure was terminated after
soil moisture had dropped near 10 percent.
Measured parameters and data
collection
Data were collected during growth and at harvest.
Measured growth parameters included canopy area, leaf length, leaf width, leaf
area, sun-lighted canopy area, soil moisture and specific leaf water content
(SLWC). Canopy area at early vegetative growth, up until 7 WAS and before
leaves overlapped occurred, was directly measured using digital image analyzer
developed by Easlon and Bloom (2014). Meanwhile sun-lighted canopy area was
measured after overlapping amongst leaves had occurred. Leaf length and width
were measured and used as predictors in developing models for leaf area
estimation. The models were validated with results of direct leaf area
measurement. Soil moisture was daily measured for monitoring drought stress
during exposure period using soil moisture meter (Lutron PMS-714, Lutron
Electronic Enterprise Co., Ltd., Taiwan). SLWC were calculated according to the
procedure described by Meihana et al. (2017). Parameters measured at
harvest included days to harvest, head yield, head volume, head density, fresh
yield, dry shoot biomass, and head water content. Head density was calculated
based on ratio between head fresh weight per volume.
Developing models for leaf area
estimation
Leaves used in this estimation models were limited to
open, unfolded leaves, i.e., not including leaves that tightly wrapped
the head. Leaf length and width were used as predictors. Measurement was done
using flexible metering tape since cabbage leaf is not properly flat. Two
regression models selected were power and zero-intercept quadratic if only
single predictor was used, i.e., leaf length (L) or width (W); and simple
linear model was added if dual predictor of L × W was selected. Development and
validation of models was done according to the protocol described by Lakitan et
al. (2017).
Statistical analysis
Collected data were analyzed using the analysis of
variance, followed by mean comparison among the treatment means using the least
squared difference at P < 0.05. Relationship between two measured parameters
was evaluated based on regression and correlation procedures.
Results
Effects of
early seedling transplantation
Age of seedling at transplantation is a crucial factor in cultivation
of annual vegetable crops. Early transplanting deals with tiny and fragile seedling, whereas
keeping seedling at nursery for longer period could halt seedling growth and
cause etiolation
Fig.
1: Cabbage plants were transplanted earlier at 3 WAS exhibited larger
canopy at ages of 5, 6 and 7 weeks than those transplanted at 4 and 5 WAS
Fig. 2: Leaf length
(A), width (B) and length x width (C) were very reliable predictors for
estimating leaf area in tropical lowland cabbage prior to heading development. Models used were zero-intercept quadratic (A and B) and
linear (C) regressions
due to high seedling density in limited nursery space.
In this study, transplanting of cabbage seedlings as early as 3 weeks after
sowing (WAS) consistently gave clear advantage over later transplanting time (4
or 5 WAS) as indicated by larger canopy area of earlier transplanted seedlings
(3 WAS), especially during early vegetative growth phase, i.e., 5 to 7
WAS (Fig. 1).
Leaf area estimation models
Cabbage is a leafy vegetable; therefore, leaf is a
biologically and commercially important organ. Larger leaf and canopy area in
cabbage most likely produce larger head. For continuous monitoring of plant
growth, a non-destructive approach should be used in measuring leaf and canopy
areas. Models for accurately estimating leaf or canopy area can be created
based on correlation between leaf or canopy area and non-destructively
measurable predictors such as leaf length and/or width. Some regression models
had been proven to be highly accurate (R2 > 0.99) in predicting
leaf area (Fig. 2) and canopy area using leaf length (L), leaf width (W), or
combination of leaf length and width (L x W) as predictors.
In case of
canopy area estimation, accuracy of L x W as predictor diminished after leaves
had heavily overlapped, i.e., at 7 WAS (Fig. 3). Strong correlation at 5
and 6 WAS indicated that leaves of cabbage plants had not been overlapped;
while weak correlation at 7 WAS indicates that the leaves had been overlapped.
Predicting head yield based on
leaf and canopy size
It was assumed that cabbage plant with larger canopy
would produce larger head, therefore, higher yield. It was also beneficial if
the yield could be predicted as early as possible so that farmer could make early
decision on how to manage and/or what to expect on his/her current growing
season. At early vegetative growth, i.e., 5 WAS, canopy area was a good
representation for whole plant size; therefore, it was used to predict head
yield. Results of this study indicated that canopy area at 5 WAS exhibited a
clear trend that cabbage plant with larger leaf area would produce higher
yield, i.e., heavier head fresh weight and larger head volume (Fig. 4). Yet,
the correlations were not very strong. Cabbage plant was harvested at 15 WAS,
therefore, there was 10-week prediction gap. With this 10-week span, variable
micro-agro-climatic conditions could be faced by each individual plant.
At 7 WAS,
surface area of the selected largest leaf was used and compared with canopy
area as predictor for head yield in cabbage plant. Since the leaf was kept
attached to the plant, i.e., non-destructive measurement, surface area
was estimated using linear regression model with L x W as predictor (see Fig. 2
panel C). From the comparison, surface area of the largest leaf of cabbage
plant was a better predictor for head fresh weight and volume than canopy area
did at 7 WAS (Fig. 5). It also clearly shown that canopy area was not a good
predictor for yield after overlapping amongst leaves within the canopy had been
heavily occurred. Shorter span between time of predicting and predicted
occurrence increased reliability of the prediction. Furthermore, accuracy of
prediction in cabbage head was higher on fresh weight than on volume.
Cabbage has
very short petiole. Leaf length in this case is basically measurement of leaf
midrib length. Measurement at 9 WAS is the last chance to non-destructively
measure length and width of cabbage leaf since, afterward, the leaves start to
bend-in to form the head. Leaf length and width were separately used as
predictor for head fresh weight and head volume. Leaf length was better that
leaf width in predicting both head fresh weight and head volume (Fig. 6). The
comparison was based on value of coefficient determination. Consistently, it
was found that prediction of fresh weight was more accurate than prediction of
head volume. The less accurateness in predicting head volume was associated
with variable density of cabbage head.
Based on
three different times of predicting and four different predictors used, it can
be concluded that the most reliable prediction for head fresh weight in cabbage
plant is by using length of the largest leaf as predictor and measured at 9
WAS, i.e., shortly prior to head initiation.
Fig.
3: Predicting canopy area in cabbage plants at age of 5 weeks (A), 6
weeks (B) and 7 weeks (C) using the leaf length x width as predictor. Solid
circle, open square, and open triangle represent of plants transplanted at 3
WAS, 4 WAS, and 5 WAS, respectively
Fig.
4: Predicting head fresh weight (A) and volume (B) based on canopy area
at 5 weeks after sowing
Short term drought caused
temporary leaf wilting but did not affect head yield
Soil moisture
significantly dropped after 4 consecutive days without water supply in both water
stress treatments, i.e., prior to (Week 7) and during (Week 13) head
developments. Soil moisture gradually decreased to nearly 10% during water stress
treatment prior to heading for cabbage plants transplanted at 3 and 4 WAS and
to above 14% for cabbage transplanted at 5 WAS. However, soil temperature was not
significantly affected by drought (Fig. 7). All cabbage plants treated with
water stress, regardless timing of transplanting or stress imposed, all
exhibited severe leaf wilting (Fig. 8) but all were able to recover on the next
day after stress treatment was terminated.
Fig. 5: Predicting head fresh weight (A
and B) and volume (C and D) based on canopy and surface area of the largest
leaf at 7 weeks after sowing
Fig. 7: Soil
moisture and temperature measured during drought exposure at 7 WAS for cabbage
plants transplanted at 3 WAS (A and B), 4 WAS (C and D) and 5 WAS (E and F).
Broken line represents stressed plants and solid line represents control plants
data
Fig.
8: Wilted leaves of tropical lowland cabbage after consecutively exposed
to drought stress for 4 days
The most significant decreased in percentage of leave
water content (LWC) was observed in cabbage plant transplanted at 3 WAS (Fig.
9). Decrease in LWC is associated with loss of water due to transpiration and
limited water absorbed by plant roots under low soil moisture in growing
substrate. Plant with large total leaf area lost more water to surrounding air
and depleted more water in substrate. Cabbage transplanted at 3 WAS had higher
total leaf area as indicated by higher canopy area, number of leaves and average
leaf size. Less decrease in SLWC compared to decrease in percentage of LWC was
associated with restriction of leaf expansion due to lack of internal hydraulic
pressure under limited water content in the leaves of drought stressed plants.
Effects of early transplanting
and short-term drought on the yield
Early transplanting of 3-week-old seedlings resulted in
early harvest of tropical lowland cabbage, higher head yield and larger head
volume; but density of the fresh head was significantly less than that
transplanted a week later using 4-week-old seedlings (Fig. 10). Also, early
transplanting increased dry head biomass and head water content (Table 1);
however, short-term water stress did not cause long term effect on growth and
yield of cabbage plant, except slight increase in head fresh weight for plant
exposed to drought stress prior to head initiation and decrease in head fresh
weight for plant exposed to drought during head enlargement.
Fig. 9: Leaf water
content and specific leaf water content during 4 days of gradual soil drying in
tropical lowland cabbage transplanted at 3 WAS (A and B), 4 WAS (C and D), and
5 WAS (E and F)
Fig. 10: Delaying transplanting caused delay time of harvest (A), decreased
head yield (B), decrease and head volume (C), and highest head density in the
tropical lowland cabbage transplanted at 4 WAS (D)
Table 1: Dry head biomass and head water
content in lowland cabbage
Dry head biomass (g) |
Head water content (%) |
|||
T1
(3 WAS) |
21.47 |
a |
93.31 |
a |
T2
(4 WAS) |
18.13 |
b |
91.92 |
a |
T3
(5 WAS) |
13.78 |
c |
91.91 |
a |
LSD 0.05 |
3.11 |
1.42 |
||
Control |
18.60 |
a |
91.86 |
a |
Drought at Week 9 |
18.80 |
a |
92.31 |
a |
Drought at Week 13 |
15.98 |
a |
91.96 |
a |
LSD.05 |
3.11 |
1.42 |
Mean values within a column followed by the same letters
are not significantly different at P
< 0.05
Discussion
There are many reasons for farmers to prepare seedlings
in nursery and then do transplanting the seedlings to the field or larger pots
at a certain time. Benefits of preparing seedlings prior to transplanting are
usually compared with direct seeding practice. The benefits include: (a) easier
to maintain at earlier seedling growth since the practice require less space,
less water, and less weed to handle; (b) able to intensively monitor seedling
development and taking immediate action if unexpected things happen; (c) making
possible to start growing season earlier in location with natural climatic
limitation such as long inundation period in riparian wetlands using floating
seedling preparation system (Ramadhani et al. 2018; Siaga et al.
2018; 2019; Jaya et al. 2019) or in long winter climate by preparing seedling
within the greenhouse before transplanting seedling to the field; and (d)
selecting uniform seedlings to be used for cultivation on field or hydroponic
system.
Delaying
transplanting of rice seedlings has been a popular research topic (Huang et al.
2019; McDonald et al. 2019; Lampayan et al. 2019); however, much
less research have been focused on similar topics for vegetable crops despite
transplanting is also commonly practiced. Delaying transplanting means farmers
use older seedlings. Lampayan et al. (2015) reported that use of oldest
seedlings (30-day old) consistently resulted in lower yield and found that
critical seedling age for rice was around 20 days old. However, the exact
critical age in rice plant varies amongst varieties and agro-climatic
conditions. For instance, Brar et al. (2012) reported that transplanting
of 30-day old seedlings gave significantly higher grain yield and water
productivity over 60 days old seedlings.
Result of
this study indicated that the seedlings accelerate their growth soon after
being transplanted from each tiny cell in tray to much larger pot containing
spacious growing substrate for roots to explore. In contrast, growth of
seedlings kept in plug cell was almost completely halted; therefore, delaying
transplanting extent halted growth in seedlings. Decrease in growth and yield
of vegetables had been reported in onion (Khan et al. 2019), winter
squash (Conti et al. 2015); however, negative effects of delaying
transplanting may also associate with change of climatic condition (Kandil et
al. 2013). Meanwhile, Shin et al. (2000) reported that growth of red
pepper seedlings was faster if larger plug cells were used, suggesting that
limited rhizosphere halted growth; or as a plant grows, it requires larger
rhizosphere.
Continuous
monitoring of leaf or canopy expansion rate requires non-destructive
measurement (Lakitan et al. 2017; Shabani and Sepaskhah 2017). In leafy
vegetables, total leaf area can be used as proxy for yield. Therefore,
frequency of new leaf development and leaf expansion rate are valuable for
developing model on predicting time to harvest. Leaf length (L), leaf width
(W), and combination of the two (L x W) were very reliable predictors for leaf
area. L x W is also reliable for estimating canopy area of cabbage up to 6 WAS.
At 7 WAS and older, leaves of cabbage started to randomly overlay between one
to another; therefore, total area of sun-lighted canopy cannot be consistently
predicted based on L x W. It should be beneficial if head weight and volume can
be predicted using any measurable physical characteristics in cabbage measured
at 6 WAS.
Morphological
characteristics during early vegetative growth prior to head initiation
disclosed legitimate relation to head yield. The trends were clear that cabbage
plants with larger canopy size at 5 WAS, larger leaf size at 7 WAS and longer
leaf midrib at 9 WAS produce higher head fresh weight and larger head volume,
but they were not characterized by higher head density. Accuracy of the
prediction was much better when it was made at 9 WAS.
It was
interesting to note that short-term drought exposed prior to and during heading
phase significantly decreased soil moisture and leaf water content during
stress exposures, also visually exhibited severe leaf wilting; yet, cabbage
plants were able to recover after the short-term drought stress and the yield
was not significantly affected. Yin and Bauerle (2017) argued that plant
hydraulic pressure, leaf anatomy and physiology affect plant propensity towards
recovery, and reflect evolutionary consequences of plant adaptation to their
habitat. Physiologically, Wang et al. (2019) explained that drought-resistant
cultivar had a smaller photosynthetic affected area, longer catalase enzyme
activity duration, and lower H2O2 accumulation. However,
in this case, cabbage has a large total leaf area. As a response to this
dispute, Hlavacova et al. (2018) provided relevant argument that
response of photosynthetic parameters to short-term (3–7 days) drought were
more pronounced than yield parameters. In this study, short-term drought stress
did not significantly affect time to harvest, economic yield, biomass, and water
content at harvest. Short-term acute or moderate drought stress for 4 days
increased in content of functional compounds (flavonoids, carotenoids,
chlorophylls) and total antioxidant activity at harvest in lettuce (Paim et
al. 2020). Niu et al. (2018) also reported that moderate drought
stress was beneficial to root growth and yield in cotton plant. Interaction
between abscisic acid and gibberellic acid signals might play an important role
in root growth compensatory effects.
Conclusion
In conclusion, seedlings of tropical lowland cabbage
should be transplanted at 3 WAS for earlier harvest and higher head yield. Head
yield can be predicted as earlier as 5 WAS using canopy area as predictor;
however, more accurate prediction could be achieved at 9 WAS using length of
leaf midrib as predictor. Short-term (4 days) gradual drought exposure did not
significantly affect head yield and biomass of the cabbage plant used in this
study. It is recommended that farmers should transplant the cabbage seedlings
at age of three weeks after seed sowing. Farmers should not excessively water
their cabbage plants. Watering can be applied at every other days or every
three days for reducing water use in cabbage cultivation.
Acknowledgements
We deeply appreciate the kind attention by the editor of
this journal; also, for comments and suggestion by the anonymous reviewers of
our manuscript. This research was funded by the Applied Research Program,
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology, Indonesia. Grant Number
299/SP2H/LT/DRPM/2021.
Author Contributions
BL created and designed the research; did specific
statistical analysis; wrote the fist and submitted version of the manuscript;
acted as corresponding author. KK supervised data collection and analysis; edited
and enriched the manuscript. NP performed all field works; collected raw data
and conducted basic statistical analysis.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no
conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
All the related Ddata is available and
reported in the manuscript. will be available as requested.
Ethics Approval
The authors declare that the research was
in accordance with all ethical standards.
References
Albano CM, KC McGwire, MB
Hausner, DJ McEvoy, CG Morton, JL Huntington (2020). Drought sensitivity and
trends of riparian vegetation vigor in Nevada, USA (1985‒2018). Remote
Sensing 12:1362
Ameli
AA, IF Creed (2019). Does wetland location matter when managing wetlands for
watershed‐scale flood and drought resilience? J Amer Water Res Assoc
55:529‒542
Brar
SK, SS Mahal, AS Brar, KK Vashist, N Sharma, GS Buttar (2012). Transplanting
time and seedling age affect water productivity, rice yield and quality in
north-west India. Agric Water Manage 115:217‒222
Cabezas A, M Gonzalez-Sanchís,
B Gallardo, FA Comín (2011). Using continuous surface water level and
temperature data to characterize hydrological connectivity in riparian
wetlands. Environ Monitor Assess 183:485‒500
Chen H, G Wang, X Lu, M Jiang, IA
Mendelssohn (2015). Balancing the needs of China’s wetland conservation and
rice production. Environ Sci Tech 49:6385‒6393
Conti
S, G Villari, E Amico, G Caruso (2015). Effects of production system and
transplanting time on yield, quality and antioxidant content of organic winter
squash (Cucurbita moschata Duch.). Sci Hortic 183:136‒143
Easlon
HM, AJ Bloom (2014). Easy Leaf Area: Automated digital image analysis for rapid
and accurate measurement of leaf area. Appl Plant Sci 2:1400033
Garssen AG, JT Verhoeven,
MB Soons (2014). Effects of climate‐induced increases in summer drought
on riparian plant species: A meta‐analysis. Freshwater Biol
59:1052‒1063
Hlavacova
M, K Klem, B Rapantova, K Novotna, O Urban, P Hlavinka, P Smutna, V Horakova, P
Skarpa, E Pohankova, M Wimmerova, M Orsag, F Jurecka, M Trnka (2018).
Interactive effects of high temperature and drought stress during stem
elongation, anthesis and early grain filling on the yield formation and
photosynthesis of winter wheat. Field Crops Res 221:182‒195
Huang
M, S Fang, S Shan, Y Zou (2019). Delayed transplanting reduced grain yield due
to low temperature stress at anthesis in machine-transplanted late-season rice.
Exp Agric 55:843‒848
Jaya
KK, B Lakitan, ZP Negara (2019). Depth of water-substrate interface in floating
culture and nutrient-enriched substrate effects on green apple eggplant. AGRIVITA
J Agric Sci 41:230‒237
Junk WJ, MTF Piedade, J Schöngart, M
Cohn-Haft, JM Adeney, F Wittmann (2011). A classification of major
naturally-occurring Amazonian lowland wetlands. Wetlands 31:623‒640
Kandil
AA, AE Sharief, FH Fathalla (2013). Effect of transplanting dates of some onion
cultivars on vegetative growth, bulb yield and its quality. Crop Prod
2:72‒82
Khan
NH, SM Khan, NU Khan, A Khan, A Farid, SA Khan, N Ali, M Saeed, I Hussain, S Ali
(2019). Flowering initiation in onion bulb crop as influenced by transplanting
dates and nitrogen fertilizer. J Anim Plant Sci 29:772‒782
Lakitan
B, LI Widuri, M Meihana (2017). Simplifying procedure for a non-destructive,
inexpensive, yet accurate trifoliate leaf area estimation in snap bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris). J Appl Hortic 19:15‒21
Lakitan
B, B Hadi, S Herlinda, E Siaga, LI Widuri, K Kartika, L Lindiana, Y
Yunindyawati, M Meihana (2018). Recognizing farmers’ practices and constraints
for intensifying rice production at Riparian Wetlands in Indonesia.
NJAS-Wageningen. J Life Sci 85:10‒20
Lakitan
B, L Lindiana, LI Widuri, K Kartika, E Siaga, M Meihana, A Wijaya (2019).
Inclusive and ecologically-sound food crop cultivation at tropical non-tidal
wetlands in Indonesia. AGRIVITA J Agric Sci 41:23‒31
Lampayan
RM, JE Faronilo, TP Tuong, AJ Espiritu, JL De Dios, RS Bayot, CS Boeno, Y Hosen
(2015). Effects of seedbed management and delayed transplanting of rice
seedlings on crop performance, grain yield and water productivity. Field
Crop Res 183:303‒314
Lampayan
R, P Xangsayasane, C Bueno (2019). Crop performance and water productivity of
transplanted rice as affected by seedling age and seedling density under
alternate wetting and drying conditions in Lao PDR. Water 11:1816
McDonald
AJ, V Kumar, SP Poonia, AK Srivastava, RK Malik (2019). Taking the climate risk
out of transplanted and direct seeded rice: Insights from dynamic simulation in
Eastern India. Field Crop Res 239:92‒103
Meihana
M, B Lakitan, MU Harun, LI Widuri, K Kartika, E Siaga, H Kriswantoro (2017).
Steady shallow water table did not decrease leaf expansion rate, specific leaf
weight, and specific leaf water content in tomato plants. Aust J Crop Sci
11:1635‒1641
Niu
J, S Zhang, S Liu, H Ma, J Chen, Q Shen, C Ge, X Zhang, C Pang, X Zhao (2018).
The compensation effects of physiology and yield in cotton after drought
stress. J Plant Physiol 224:30‒48
Paim
BT, RL Crizel, SJ Tatiane, VR Rodrigues, CV Rombaldi, V Galli (2020). Mild
drought stress has potential to improve lettuce yield and quality. Sci Hortic
272:109578
Ramadhani
F, B Lakitan, M Hasmeda (2018). Decaying Utricularia-biomass versus soil-based
substrate for production of high quality pre-transplanted rice seedlings using
floating seedbeds. Aust J Crop Sci 12:1983‒1988
Ria
RP, B Lakitan, F Sulaiman, K Kartika, RA Suwignyo (2020). Cross-ecosystem
utilizing primed seeds of upland rice varieties for enriching crop diversity at
riparian wetland during dry season. Biodiversitas 21:3008‒3017
Shabani
A, AR Sepaskhah (2017). Leaf area estimation by a simple and non-destructive
method. Iran Agric Res 36:101‒104
Shin
Y, K Kim, Y Kim, T Seo, J Chung, H Pak (2000). Effect of plug cell size and
seedling age on seedling quality and early growth after transplanting of red
pepper. J Kor Soc Hortic Sci 41:49‒52
Siaga
E, B Lakitan, H Hasbi, SM Bernas (2018). Application of floating culture system
in chili pepper (Capsicum annum L.) during prolonged flooding period at
riparian wetland in Indonesia. Aust J Crop Sci 12:808‒816
Siaga
E, B Lakitan, H Hasbi, SM Bernas, LI Widuri, K Kartika (2019). Floating seedbed
for preparing rice seedlings under unpredictable flooding occurrence at
tropical riparian wetland. Bulg J Agric Sci 25:326‒336
Yin
J, TL Bauerle (2017). A global analysis of plant recovery performance from
water stress. Oikos 126:1377‒1388
Wang
X, H Liu, F Yu, B Hu, Y Jia, H Sha, H Zhao (2019). Differential activity of the
antioxidant defense system and alterations in the accumulation of osmolyte and
reactive oxygen species under drought stress and recovery in rice (Oryza
sativa L.) tillering. Sci Rep 9:1‒11